Back to Projects

Agri-tech • B2B SaaS • Ecosystem Design

Designing connected experiences for India’s agri-commerce ecosystem.

Helping commission agents and traders navigate multiple products through one connected experience.

Agri-techB2B SaaS8 MonthsProduct DesignSystems DesignPlatform Thinking
ONO — agri-commerce ecosystem case study

02 / TL;DR

The story in four lines.

Background

ONO is an agri-tech startup building products for agricultural trading, bookkeeping, credit and operational management.

Problem

Users perceived ONO as multiple disconnected products instead of one connected ecosystem.

Approach

Worked closely with founders, product managers, developers and QA to build connected experiences across products.

Outcome

Improved product discoverability and reduced friction across the ecosystem.

03 / Project Snapshot

At a glance.

8Months embedded with the team
2Major products — mOS + CASH
1Unified ecosystem of connected journeys
4+Cross-functional stakeholder groups
Role
In-house UI/UX Designer
Category
Agri-tech Startup
Location
Bangalore
Duration
8 Months
Team
Founder · Product Managers · Developers · QA
Responsibilities
Product Design · UX Strategy · Design Systems · Cross-functional Collaboration · Developer Handoff · Iteration Support

04 / Understanding ONO

Building for users who weren’t digital natives.

Most users were commission agents and traders operating within India’s mandi ecosystem — many of them first-time digital users. The challenge wasn’t adding features; it was bringing technology in without adding complexity. The products had to feel approachable, familiar and trustworthy.

FarmersCommission AgentsTradersONO Products

05 / The Bigger Problem

A fragmented ecosystem created friction.

Low Product Awareness

Users only knew the product they initially installed.

Fragmented Experiences

Multiple products created multiple entry points.

Low Cross-product Adoption

Users rarely explored other ONO products.

Disconnected Journeys

Switching products interrupted workflows.

06 / mOS — Deep Dive

Unifying ONO’s ecosystem under one roof.

mOS is a central operating system that connects ONO’s products into one experience. Instead of juggling multiple apps, users get a single entry point — cutting friction while making the rest of the ecosystem easy to discover.

Key Decisions

Dashboard over navigation overload

ProblemMultiple products meant multiple menus to learn.
DecisionA single dashboard as the home for everything.
ReasonOne predictable place beats many scattered entry points.

Product discovery made visible

ProblemUsers only knew the one product they had installed.
DecisionSurface the rest of the ecosystem on the dashboard.
ReasonYou can’t adopt what you can’t see.

Reusable components for familiarity

ProblemEach product looked and behaved differently.
DecisionA shared component library across mOS.
ReasonFamiliarity lowers the curve for first-time digital users.

Business goals aligned with user goals

ProblemGrowth targets could have meant pushy cross-sell.
DecisionMake discovery helpful, never promotional.
ReasonAdoption sticks when it genuinely serves the user.

Inside mOS

Inside mOS — annotated breakdown of the dashboard, product switcher, smartboard and profile

07 / Navigation Exploration

Exploring multiple ways to connect products.

Problem

Tab Navigation

Not scalable as the product set grew.

Problem

Hamburger Menu

Poor discoverability — options stayed hidden.

Problem

Floating Action Button

Hidden actions users rarely found.

Final solution

Horizontal Product Carousel

Scannable, scalable, and surfaced products in context.

08 / CASH — Deep Dive

Making financial products easier to understand.

CASH is ONO’s lending product — it helps users apply for loans and manage repayments. The existing experience lacked hierarchy and clarity, so the rework focused on trust, visibility and self-service.

What users struggled with

Loan Status

No clear answer to “where does my loan stand right now?”

Repayment Tracking

Hard to tell what was due, paid, or still pending.

Outstanding Amounts

The total a user still owed was buried.

Application Progress

No visibility into where an application was stuck.

Key Decisions

Bring summaries upfront

ProblemKey numbers were buried inside sub-screens.
DecisionLead with balance, dues and status at the top.
ReasonThe most-asked questions deserve the most prominent space.

Separate loans and applications

ProblemActive loans and pending applications were mixed together.
DecisionSplit them into distinct, labelled spaces.
ReasonDifferent states call for different actions.

Increase repayment visibility

ProblemUsers couldn’t tell what was due or already paid.
DecisionMake repayment timelines explicit and scannable.
ReasonClarity around money builds trust.

Reduce dependency on support

ProblemEvery small question became a support call.
DecisionAdd self-service status and history.
ReasonSelf-serve answers scale; support calls don’t.

Before & After

CASH — before the redesignBefore
CASH — after the redesignAfter

Inside CASH

Inside CASH — annotated breakdown of the smartboard, loans and applications screens

09 / Systems Thinking

Beyond individual screens.

The biggest lesson from ONO was that products rarely exist in isolation. Building ecosystems meant balancing users, business priorities and technical constraints at the same time.

Ecosystems are products too.

The connective tissue between apps needed as much care as any single screen.

Discoverability drives adoption.

People only adopt what they can actually find.

Complexity stays behind the scenes.

The system can be intricate; the surface has to stay calm.

10 / Outcomes

What the work changed.

Increased product awareness
Reduced switching friction
Improved cross-product adoption
Better stakeholder alignment

11 / Reflection

Key takeaways.

Closeness with founders accelerated decisions.

Direct access meant fewer handoffs and faster, sharper calls.

Design systems matter more as products scale.

What felt optional early became the backbone across mOS and CASH.

Business problems reveal bigger opportunities.

The fragmentation pain pointed straight at the ecosystem opportunity.

Next Project

Case Study

MyRoom

View project →
You